Covid-19

Following the campus guidelines for Coronavirus all UC Davis classes, lectures, seminars, labs and discussion sections will move to virtual instruction and remain virtual through the end of Summer Session 2021, including final exams. Given this, the department’s administrative functions have moved to remote work conditions. To contact staff members of the department via e-mail or phone, please go to our administrative staff contact page.  We anticipate a return to campus for Fall 2021.

Home | News |

Education Next features Marianne Bitler's research on the role of alternative curricula for young children's school readiness.

In an article informing the current pre-K curriculum debate the Education Next featured Professor Marianne Bitler’s recent work on the benefits of academic focused curricula relative to the widely used “whole-child” curricula.  

Marianne and her coauthors use experimental data to estimate impacts on school readiness of different kinds of preschool curricula – a largely neglected preschool input and measure of preschool quality. They find that the widely-used “whole-child” curricula found in most Head Start and pre-K classrooms produced higher classroom process quality than did locally-developed curricula, but failed to improve children's school readiness. A curriculum focused on building mathematics skills increased both classroom math activities and children's math achievement relative to the whole-child curricula. Similarly, curricula focused on literacy skills increased literacy achievement relative to whole-child curricula, despite failing to boost measured classroom process quality.

 The paper, entitled “Boosting school readiness: Should preschool   teachers target skills or the whole child?”, was recently published in   the  Economics of Education Review Journal in August 2018. The   paper is co-authored with Jade M. Jenkinsa, Greg J. Duncan,  Anamarie Auger, Thurston Domina and Margaret Burchinal.